Alternative Cancer Treatment flying with the Pelican Paradox
Any talks or articles about alternative cancer medicine, or alternative cancer treatments, are always portrayed and considered controversial or misleading.
The following information is to assist you in making a decision about cancer treatment when diagnosed with cancer. Please note: in no circumstance is the material provided to replace medical advice or to diagnose or treat any health conditions. As per legal requirements, it is strongly recommended you seek further medical advice prior to making any decision. Furthermore take the time to review our website's Terms and Conditions.
Have you ever seen a pelican flying?
If yes, pause a moment to remember the images. If you have never seen a pelican fly, start by watching 16 seconds video.
But what do flying pelicans have to do with Cancer therapy? All will be explained by the end of the article!
The unbalanced information about conventional cancer treatments and/or its associated research is brainwashing the large majority of people, with much effort and money spent by the Establishment and Pharmaceutical Industry. Currently the rules and channels used to carry all such information are not designed to provide you with a fair basis to enable you to make an appropriate decision on a course of treatment for cancer. Any efforts to mention alternative cancer treatments are immediately squashed. Your choice to follow conventional medical or alternative cancer treatments should at least be based on an educated decision, facilitated by all opinions expressed and presented.
What is Cancer?
Cancer describes a range of diseases in which abnormal cells proliferate and spread out-of-control. Other terms for cancer are tumours and neoplasms, although these terms can also be used for non-cancerous growths (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra).
Let it be clear that Cancer is not a disease, but describes a range of diseases!
Cancer is big business and big money (estimated around $200 billion/year) and like any business, it is all about marketing and profits.
It is important to understand that the proliferation of abnormal cells (or tumours and neoplasms), commonly refered to as cancer, is the foundation of an empire supported by fear. It is an empire that would actually crumble if the focus became based on the causes creating abnormal cells, rather than the necessity to reduce the tumours size and not address the cause. Not intending to insult anyone’s intelligence, but since when trying to address the cause or the creation of abnormal cells is considered as an alternative cancer treatment? May it be to address the cause by prevention or by reaction.
Medical history
Long gone is the era when ‘bleeding by leaches’ in order to detoxify the blood to cure any disease was the best conventional medical treatment, as offered to Kings (today this treatment is considered as alternative).
The arrogance of Medical Industry’s stand to believe they have the only correct and proper answer to any ailments. Yet, humility and precaution should be in vigour when it is understood and accepted that 5% of the medical truth changes every 20 years. After all, for centuries it was a medical fact that the heart was the main organ of the body. Only recently this certainty has been modified to consider the brain as the most important organ. The full power of brain is barely understood and its full potential barely used or known.
Medical knowledge is valuable and important; it can save lives in some circumstances. The appropriate use of medical intervention in case of acute situations can surely assist - and be vital - in one’s well being. Far too often though, alternative or complementary medicine (as described by the institutions) generates a negative connotation; but do the medical profession provide genuine medicine themselves?
What is alternative, complementary or conventional medicine?
Has the alternative medicine concept just been designed to better regulate and monitor people?
We have developed into a more humane society: apparently we no longer burn ‘witches’ at the stake, we just sue and jail them! This is clearly a more acceptable way to suppress knowledge and progress, by enforcing control over your fears or weakness by brainwashing.
Shouldn’t medicine be based on effective results and not on patented drugs or percentages, considering their array of side effects? Present regulatory organizations are truly working hard to stop any attempt to look at real solutions to problems; unless it can be patented, for which a ‘close enough is good enough’ policy is accepted.
Some statistics and facts about cancer:
➢ The annual death rate of people diagnosed with cancer in the UK is 154,162 people in 2006 (1), estimated approximately 565,650 in the US for 2008 (2). It was estimated that in 2006 there were 39,200 deaths from cancer in Australia (21,900 males and 17,300 females) (3).
➢ It is estimated that in 2006 there were 106,000 new cases of cancer diagnosed in Australia (60,600 males and 45,400 females) (4).
➢ Death from breast cancer was of 2,641 in 2004 in Australia, and the most common cancer diagnosed in females with 12,027 new cases in 2002 (14,818 projected new breast cancer cases in 2011 (4).
➢ Spending on conventional cancer therapy in UK is $2.8 billion a year and in the US it is 10 times higher.
➢ There are currently over 24,000 drugs marketed without any proven therapy value (5).
➢ “…at least 80% of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless…neither doctors or patients are willing to give up on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works! (Dr U Abel, Lancet, 10 Aug 1991).
➢ After analysing cancer survival statistic for several decades, Dr H Jones a professor at the University of California states: “Patients are as well or better off, untreated”. This statement has never been refuted.
➢ There is no scientific proof to the correlation of life expectancy extension and the shrinking of a cancer tumour.
➢ 67% of people who die during cancer treatment do so as a direct result of the immune system failing because of the aggressive and toxic nature of the drugs (6).
➢ Although it may vary, it is believed that 95.65% of statistics are made up and can be interpreted to suit and support ones interest (7).
A Business founded on Fear
The most effective way to create an immediate reaction to a situation is to induce a ‘fear factor’. When the fear factor is coupled with time urgency, then it is easier to achieve a stronger reaction for acting towards the desired outcome. This is a well know marketing tool: “Hurry stock won’t last! Only two left!” Most ideological belief systems are fear-based: “Do that and you will go to hell!” By adding an element of urgency to a fear factor, the sense of vulnerability is greater; hence, you have a more successful chance in obtaining the reaction you are after.
Prior to the diagnosis:
There is constant media exposure about cancer related deaths and issues. Messages are commonly found in advertising, cancer fundraising, cancer-raising awareness, battle or death of someone famous (for example, Kylie Minogue with breast cancer; Lance Armstrong with testicular cancer), plus many other tactics to alert you of ‘the great plague’ and ‘dangers of cancer’. So when you are diagnosed, most of the influential work has already been done in passively educating you about the subject.
“I am sorry; this is a very rare and aggressive form of cancer.”
“This cancer is very aggressive and metastasizes quickly. We need to act quickly and we have some of the best people in this field that can help you right now.”
“If you do not start the chemotherapy immediately you will have less than 3 months to live. We must move quickly with the chemo.”
When given a diagnosis of cancer that is considered a death sentence, most people go into a state of emotional stress and disbelief; you are unable to think clearly. Therefore, and unfortunately, you relinquish your decision making processes to the people that are perceived to be the most appropriate deciders and knowledgeable on the matter at the time. Your own family tries to convince you to ‘do the right thing’ and to ‘follow the doctor’s recommendations, because they know better’. Constant sociological and peer pressures force you into making the only decision that is ‘readily acceptable’. In this instance, media brainwashing has become a well-greased system and in its time, has produced a great return on investment - at your expense. It is very common that when a person is in fear, huge internal dilemmas appear, even contradicting one’s own beliefs system about the best thing to do; “I should have never done this, or let this happened!”
Cancer: Prevention is better than the cure
The Medical approach to prevention or cure for caner, is to waste money on research for a vaccine - by the way is still “soon to come”, yet not any closer than in 1970 - that will finally justify all the charades and ensure the medical profession to be perceived at its best.
The controversial side effects from the cervical cancer vaccine’s fiasco proved there is a complete lack of answers from the scientific “patentable”, pharmaceutical industry viewpoint in preventing cancer. When it comes to cervical cancer, it is believed that the Human Papilloma virus is the cause of the "cancer" tumour; hence the plausible prevention by vaccination. But what about the body’s natural ability with its immune system to deal with the problem adequately, if provided with all the elements of support?
It is rather disconcerting considering the continuously misleading information about finding a cure for a condition of which the cause is not understood; and surely the deceptions and lies are to maintain public or private sector funding, forming one of the biggest global scams ever achieved!
The best preventative steps you can take to reduce your exposure to abnormal cells remains in staying healthy. Stress - being emotional, physical, environmental and physiological or else - is one of the main key factors in the ability to maintain a healthy state of body. The importance of your brain’s ability to control and respond accordingly to every threshold of stress levels is paramount to your present and future state of health.
Mammogram & Breast cancer early detection: just another Myth.
The medical profession highly accepts the concept of prevention, especially in the case of breast cancer. It highly recommends women have a mammogram every two years for early detection of breast cancer tumours, in order to have better success rate in breast cancer treatments.
However, this recommendation is misleading. The actual information not passed on to you is that when a breast cancer tumour is visible in a routine mamogram, it has been estimated to be present in the breast for as long as 12 years (8). Today, nobody would want to run a computer on Windows 95, regardless of how good it was at the time of its release. But when it comes to breast cancer prevention, routine screening of breast by mammograms were recommended to be taken out of public funding in the US by Drs Wright and Mueller of the University of British Columbia (Lancet, July 1, 1995). It is actually the reason responsible for the increase in breast cancer rate. The pressure enforced on breast tissues during a mammogram can contribute to the creation of new abnormal cells, due to the physical damaged posed on breasts’ tissues, and thus can further increase existing breast cancer tumours.
Are you really that oblivious to what is happening, seeing it all under the guise of breast cancer prevention and early breast cancer treatment’?
It is morally wrong to associate the idea of breast cancer prevention with ‘early detection’ by way of routine mammograms; 12 years of undiagnosed or misdiagnosed problems can surely not be accepted as “early breast cancer detection”. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that self-examination of the breast for lumps do not assist in early breast cancer prevention.
In the case of breast cancer, it is important for you to grasp the idea that early detection does not mean early breast cancer prevention, as many studies have proven that routine breast checks by mammograms are currently contributing to increasing breast cancer.
Cancer treatments! Let’s look at the options we have:
Medically:
The McPherson Protocol (Chemotherapy) is the only cancer treatment offered. This protocol is quite simple in its logic and application: reducing the abnormal cells (tumours) will deal with the problem. An intravenous injection of a poison designed to destroy all cells should have some definite results on reducing tumors, as well as all good cells. Side effects from the destruction of the good cells can be looked at afterwards! More drugs can then be prescribed to assist in a reduced or destroyed immune system, or the proper cellular activity that is disabled.
As mentioned before, no correlation with the shrinking of a "cancerous" tumour and the extension of life expectancy has been proven. All we know is that 67% of patients treated with chemotherapy die from an Immune System related issue, due to the aggressive nature of treatments on healthy and damaged cells. It is understood that Antibiotics are designed to kill all bacteria (good and bad); therefore, after a course of antibiotics, it is recommended to do a course of probiotics to rebuild and increase the bacterial activity necessary for digestive processes.
What is remission?
This is when the tumour has been ‘taken care of’ and lucky-enough, the patient is still alive! In most cases, when patients do not alter their lifestyle, nutrition and attitudes, the tumour reappears within a period of five years in a more aggressive and broadened form.
This is far from being ‘the cure’ we are being told about.
The alternative medicine:
A non-medical approach is by way of nutritional and behavioural changes. There are numerous pieces of anecdotal evidence about the effects of Laetrile (Vitamin B17), Vitamin C, or even Essiac, on cancer tumours. However, the medical profession is denying fair exposure of these treatments for cancer to people, simply due to the fact that they are all-natural extracts from fruits or plants. This nutritional logic should be given priority and respect, in contrast to pharmaceutical interest in financial gain.
The question could be posed: is Laetrile (Vitamin 17) for cancer, what Vitamin C’s was for Scurvy with Sailors? Remember a human tissue cell without proper nutrition, hydration and energy, will in time become abnormal and eventually die. It is not rocket science!
This is particularly evident in the case of bowel cancer (2nd biggest death rate of all cancer in the UK). Medical doctors are now aware that bowel cancer is preventable by a change of life style and diet. Bowel cancer represented 16,092 deaths in the UK in 2005 (9) and in Australia 2,432 deaths in 2006 (10).
The essence of “alternative cancer treatment” is to address the reason for the transformation of the cell, and the control of its spreading. At the base of any treatment, the brain is the key element that will determine either its success or failure.
Alternative cancer treatment - or is it?
If you have difficulties in understanding your brain’s own power because of what is not known or understood about it yet, you should not fail to appreciate its undeniable, greater knowledge. It has the ability to address body functions, organs or disease optimally, as long as the necessary support is provided. We urge you to peruse this website and its pages: What is Neurolink NIS, What does NIS address? and A treatment. With the maze of politically-correct lingo and the potential law suites from making any claims, today’s readers certainly find it hard to attain adequate information, causing them to develop an art of ‘reading between the lines’!
A powerful treatment for cancer is the Placebo Effect Treatment. Now it is immediately important to take out any negative aspect from this terminology straight away - it is not about sugar coated pills, as currently endorsed by the medical field!
The process of the brain exerting control over a disease, the power of positive and negative thinking, has had great influence in obtaining a desired outcome. The ‘placebo effect’ is an alternative, curative mechanism, triggered by motivation in the therapeutic treatment or the belief in the potential outcome of a treatment. Thereby, it basically implies bio-chemical responses and reactions to the stimulus of belief. As the scientific community is not in position to quantify or qualify all aspects of the brain and its emotions responses, their position on the potential benefits is less than flattering - other than describing it as a fraud or fallacy. None the less, the benefits still stand true with potential application as an alternative cancer treatment.
In conclusion
If you have been diagnosed with cancer, and despite the severity of its implication, you have a decision to make:
1. To follow the medical conventional cancer treatments with all the known devastating effects.
Or
2. To accept the real benefits of alternative cancer treatments based on its values and results as well as the respect of human suffering and right to dignity.
This decision remains yours only, and you must take the time to evaluate all the options and opinions offered to you, as well as their implications. Society’s peer pressure, as well as that from your family and friends, may influence your decision; so once you have decided on a course of action, ensure you are comfortable with it! Take the time to evaluate, reflect and make the necessary changes in your life, to have a successful outcome in your situation.
Every time you read or see the word ‘cancer therapy’ and hear all the fear-mongering running hand-in-hand with conventional, medical cancer treatments, I suggest you re-run through your mind images of a pelican flying…
The Pelican Paradox:
“According to the current set laws of aerodynamic, pelicans cannot fly.”
To date, no pelican has been made aware of this law. The scientific community is baffled by the lack of consideration, education and current standing of the pelican community, which continues to defy this law, clearly by a failure on their ability to read scientific reports and studies establishing facts on which all flying objects are presently designed from.
Are alternative Cancer treatments really the alternative to conventional cancer treatments given today?